The Federal Reserve outlined plans to clarify digital asset rules and explore a capital framework for stablecoin issuers, as Vice Chair Michelle W. Bowman described recent and proposed supervisory changes in testimony before the Senate Banking Committee.
Fed Commits to Clarifying Digital Asset Rules for Banks
Digital asset regulation is taking a more defined shape within U.S. bank supervision. Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman delivered testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on Feb. 26, outlining actions already taken and additional steps planned to support responsible digital asset innovation within the regulated banking system.
“The Federal Reserve is encouraging banks to innovate to improve the products and services they provide. We have rescinded several policies that were intended to hinder innovation,” Vice Chair for Supervision Bowman stated. “We are also working with the other banking regulators to develop regulations that include capital and liquidity for stablecoin issuers as required by the GENIUS Act.” She continued:
“We will provide clarity regarding the treatment of digital assets to ensure that the banking system is well placed to support digital asset activities. This includes clarity on the permissibility of activities and willingness to provide regulatory feedback on proposed new use cases.”
Together, these remarks reflect a recalibration of oversight for crypto custody, tokenized payments, blockchain-based services, and stablecoin issuance within prudential guardrails.
In practice, the Federal Reserve rolled back several crypto-specific supervisory hurdles in 2025. In April, it rescinded SR 22-6 / CA 22-6 and SR 23-8 / CA 23-5, ending advance notification and written non-objection requirements for crypto activities and dollar tokens. It later sunset the Novel Activities Supervision Program in August, withdrew 2023 joint crypto risk statements, replaced restrictive Regulation H guidance in December, and in February 2026 moved to codify the removal of reputational risk from supervision.
Beyond digital asset-specific measures, Bowman emphasized proportional oversight for smaller institutions that may seek to engage in emerging financial technologies. “Community banks are and should be subject to less stringent standards than large banks, and there is significant opportunity to tailor regulations and supervision to the unique needs and circumstances of these banks,” she opined, emphasizing:
“We cannot continue to push policies and supervisory expectations designed for the largest banks down to smaller, less risky, and less complex banks.”
The combined approach signals a potential recalibration of supervision, as regulators work toward stablecoin rule development and digital asset clarity within existing statutory authority.
FAQ 🧭
- What does the Federal Reserve’s new approach mean for crypto in banks?
It signals clearer rules for crypto custody, stablecoins, and tokenized payments within regulated banks.
- How will stablecoin issuers be regulated under the new framework?
They will face capital and liquidity requirements developed alongside other banking regulators.
- What changes are coming for community banks exploring digital assets?
Community banks may receive more tailored and less stringent supervision compared with large institutions.
- Why is regulatory clarity important for crypto investors?
Clear supervision reduces uncertainty and could support broader institutional adoption of digital assets.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SEC Commissioner: Will Carefully Study "Innovation Exemption" for Tokenized Securities, Focus on Key Issues Such as Information Disclosure
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Commissioner Hester M. Peirce announced the launch of an "Innovation Safe Harbor" program for tokenized securities, which will allow limited trading and experimentation within a restricted scope. The program will take a more cautious approach, explore different tokenization models, and consider investor protection mechanisms. The SEC is also evaluating related disclosure and regulatory issues.
GateNews3h ago
Fed March rate cut 25 basis points probability at 1.9%, probability of maintaining interest rates unchanged reaches 98.1%
Gate News: On March 15, according to CME "FedWatch" data, the Federal Reserve will announce its interest rate decision next Thursday at 02:00. The data shows that the probability of the Federal Reserve cutting rates by 25 basis points in March is 1.9%, while the probability of maintaining rates unchanged is 98.1%.
Looking ahead to April, the probability of the Federal Reserve cumulatively cutting rates by 50 basis points is 0.1%, the probability of cumulatively cutting rates by 25 basis points is 5.8%, and the probability of maintaining rates unchanged is 94.1%.
GateNews4h ago
Uncertainty in stablecoin regulation causes traditional banks to delay infrastructure investments, while crypto companies offering 4%-5% returns may accelerate capital migration.
Unclear stablecoin regulations create operational difficulties for traditional banks, while crypto companies continue to develop in gray areas. Banks are hesitant to make large-scale investments in stablecoin infrastructure due to advice from legal counsel, resulting in limited deployment. While large-scale deposit outflows have not yet occurred, competitive pressure is increasing.
GateNews4h ago
US Senate Bans CBDC: What Happens to Its Wholesale Version?
The US Senate’s newly passed Housing Act does not clearly distinguish between retail and wholesale versions of a CBDC.
The definition of the act, though, implies that the CBDC prohibition applies only to the retail version, which is designed to be widely available to the public.
The US Senate
Blockzeit8h ago
