Aave, Kelp, LayerZero Seek $71M Frozen ETH Release on Arbitrum

CryptoFrontier
AAVE2,76%
ETH2,19%
ARB1,79%
COMP2,59%

A coalition of major DeFi protocols including Aave Labs, Kelp DAO, LayerZero, EtherFi, and Compound filed a Constitutional AIP on the Arbitrum forum Saturday requesting the network’s DAO release approximately $71 million in frozen ETH for the rsETH recovery effort known as DeFi United. The Arbitrum Security Council froze 30,765.67 ETH on April 21 after tracing it to addresses controlled by the exploiter responsible for the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit, according to The Block.

Proposal Details

Aave Labs is listed as the lead author of the proposal. Under the terms, the frozen funds would be sent to a 2-of-3 Gnosis Safe co-signed by Aave, Kelp DAO, and Certora, designated solely to receive recovered ETH and apply it toward restoring rsETH’s economic backing. If the coordinated recovery effort does not proceed as planned, the proposal authors stated they will return to Arbitrum governance to determine an alternative use.

The proposal reiterates the size of the exploiter’s position on Aave: 89,567 rsETH supplied as collateral against 82,650 WETH and 821 wstETH borrowed across the protocol’s Ethereum Core and Arbitrum V3 markets. Aave stressed that its smart contracts were not compromised and that the incident originated outside the protocol.

Aave announced the filing on X Saturday morning, with Kelp DAO following approximately half an hour later. “Every ETH released moves rsETH holders closer to whole,” Kelp wrote.

Governance Timeline and Community Concerns

Constitutional AIPs are Arbitrum’s highest-bar proposal type, and the proposal estimates a timeline of approximately 49 days: a week of forum discussion, an optional one-week temperature check, a three-day voting delay, a 14- to 16-day onchain vote, an eight-day L2 waiting period, an L2-to-L1 message finalization step of typically at least a week, and a final three-day L1 wait before execution.

The extended timeline drew immediate pushback. Delegate Nicksta raised concerns within hours of the filing, noting that “many parties have open positions on AAVE that might run into problem if they have to wait 49 days” and asking whether the process could be expedited.

Griff Green, an Arbitrum Security Council member who publicly defended the council’s freeze decision earlier in the week, agreed with the need for acceleration. Writing in his capacity as a delegate rather than a council member, Green called for moving to a Snapshot vote “as soon as possible to validate the community’s intent and avoid unnecessary delays in unlocking these funds.”

Green also flagged critical open questions before any onchain execution, including the expected outcome for Arbitrum users of Aave, the treatment of users who held rsETH before the exploit, and how losses would be socialized in the event of a partial recovery. The DAO, he wrote, should clearly communicate both full and partial recovery scenarios and the distribution plan under each.

Indemnification and DeFi United Contributions

The proposal includes an extensive indemnification clause under which Aave Labs would commit to indemnify the Arbitrum Foundation, Offchain Labs, and each individual member of the Arbitrum Security Council from any claims arising out of the freeze or the proposed release. The agreement, governed by New York law, carries no cap, basket, or deductible, and covers regulatory inquiries, tokenholder claims, and defense costs.

The 30,766 ETH represents the single largest line item in the running DeFi United tally. Other contributions proposed to date include Aave’s own 25,000 ETH DAO commitment, Lido’s 2,500 stETH, and 5,000 ETH each from EtherFi and Aave founder Stani Kulechov. Mantle has separately proposed a 30,000 ETH credit facility to Aave to absorb any residual bad debt.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

ETH Liquidation Cascade: $841M Long Positions at Risk Below $2,243, $395M Shorts Exposed Above $2,461

Gate News message, April 26 — According to Coinglass data, if Ethereum (ETH) falls below $2,243, cumulative long liquidations on major CEXs would reach $841 million. Conversely, if ETH breaks above $2,461, cumulative short liquidations on major CEXs would total $395 million.

GateNews27m ago

Aave, Kelp, LayerZero Propose Releasing $71M in Frozen ETH to Support rsETH Recovery

Gate News message, April 26 — A coalition of major DeFi protocols led by Aave Labs, joined by Kelp DAO, LayerZero, EtherFi, and Compound, filed a Constitutional AIP on Saturday morning asking the Arbitrum DAO to release approximately $71 million in frozen ETH to support DeFi United, a cross-protocol

GateNews4h ago

Ethereum Foundation Sells 10K ETH To Bitmine OTC Deal

Ethereum Foundation sells 10K ETH through OTC to fund research, development, and ecosystem grants under treasury strategy. Bitmine expands holdings through direct deals, nearing target to control about 5% of Ethereum total supply. OTC transactions enable large crypto transfers with

CryptoFrontNews7h ago

ETH Liquidation Cascade: $635M Long Positions at Risk Below $2,217, $504M Shorts Exposed Above $2,430

Gate News message, April 26 — According to Coinglass data, if Ethereum falls below $2,217, cumulative long liquidations across major CEX platforms would reach $635 million. Conversely, if ETH surges above $2,430, cumulative short liquidations would total $504 million.

GateNews8h ago

Whale Liquidates 1,351 ETH and Opens $50.6M Bitcoin Short on Hyperliquid

Gate News message, April 26 — A whale address beginning with 0x310 opened a 16x leveraged Bitcoin short position on Hyperliquid over the past 30 minutes, with a notional value of $50.6 million across 653 BTC at an average price of $77,470. The liquidation price stands at $81,308, making it the

GateNews8h ago

Aave, Kelp, LayerZero Seek $71M Frozen ETH Release from Arbitrum DAO

Aave Labs, Kelp DAO, LayerZero, EtherFi, and Compound filed a Constitutional AIP on the Arbitrum forum Saturday morning requesting the network's DAO release approximately $71 million in frozen ETH to support rsETH recovery efforts following last week's $292 million Kelp DAO exploit. The proposal

CryptoFrontier9h ago
Comment
0/400
SufiRobinvip
· 14m ago
gd
Reply0
GlowingHotAirBalloonvip
· 1h ago
It feels like "systemic risk management"; not rescuing could lead to a chain reaction of failures, but rescuing might also create moral hazard.
View OriginalReply0
SushiRebalancevip
· 1h ago
Ask a more practical question: After unfreezing ETH, who should be compensated first? rsETH users? Protocol treasury? Or should the system vulnerabilities be patched first?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4c2c8c4bvip
· 1h ago
If the rsETH recovery plan can be made into a reusable emergency framework, it would actually be a plus for Arbitrum.
View OriginalReply0
BluePeonyPrincipalProtectionvip
· 1h ago
AIP first clearly specify the risk assessment, worst-case scenario, and exit mechanism; otherwise, I lean toward voting against.
View OriginalReply0
ColdStartUnderTheAuroravip
· 1h ago
There have been many previous disputes over funds on Arbitrum, and this time with a level of 71 million USD, the voting participation rate must be maximized.
View OriginalReply0
Hendyarh91vip
· 1h ago
nice info make a great again
Reply0
ProofOfNapvip
· 1h ago
The alliance can make proposals, but don't manipulate public opinion; DAO is not an ATM.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e84f640cvip
· 1h ago
Hopefully it doesn't turn into "rescue the protocol but not retail investors"; the plan should ideally directly address the payout paths for affected users.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-88d5d071vip
· 1h ago
LayerZero and EtherFi are both involved, indicating a significant scope; but the bigger it gets, the more transparent it needs to be, or the community won't buy in.
View OriginalReply0
View More