US Prosecutors Seek $327K Crypto Forfeiture Over Romance Scam

In brief

  • The Massachusetts District of the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed for the forfeiture of nearly $328K linked to a crypto romance scam.
  • The victim was tricked into sending funds to a user they communicated with via an online dating application.
  • U.S. prosecutors recently warned the public about the dangers of romance scams and their crypto ties.

Prosecutors for the Massachusetts District of the U.S. Attorney’s Office are seeking the civil forfeiture of $327,829 in USDT as part of a money laundering scheme that victimized the user of an online dating app. An individual operating under the guise of “Linda Brown” communicated with the victim—a Massachusetts resident—for a few weeks beginning in November 2024 before offering a purported cryptocurrency investment opportunity to the individual. The victim then sent funds to wallets controlled by Brown, believing it was a legitimate investment vehicle, only to find out it was a scam when they attempted to withdraw their money later. 

The victim’s funds were then transferred between multiple wallets and later converted into USDT—the Tether-issued, dollar-backed stablecoin—from other cryptocurrencies, according to the complaint.  “It is a violation of federal law to conduct a financial transaction knowing that the transaction is designed to conceal the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of criminal proceeds,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Massachusetts wrote in a statement.  “A civil forfeiture action allows third-parties to assert claims to property,” it added, “which must be resolved before the property can be forfeited to the United States and returned to victims.”  At least a portion of the victim’s funds were traced to crypto wallets that were later seized in August 2025. Prior to forfeiture and return to the victim though, the “United States must prove, by a standard of preponderance of the evidence, that the property is subject to forfeiture,” the release indicates.

Though the crime happened in 2024, the forfeiture filing comes just a few weeks after U.S. prosecutors warned the public of romance scams tied to crypto as Valentine’s Day approached.  “Unlike traditional scams, which execute quickly, these schemes exploit both emotional and financial vulnerabilities,” an analyst told Decrypt at that time. “Scammers spend weeks or even months building your trust before introducing seemingly lucrative investment opportunities.” Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice filed to seize a record $225 million tied to similar crypto scams, which play on a victim’s confidence and trust. Such schemes are often called “pig butchering” scams, referring to the method of fattening up a swine before the slaughter.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

CFO Gets Prison Time After Losing $35 Million of Company Money in Crypto Side Hustle

Nevin Shetty, a Washington man, was sentenced to two years in prison for diverting $35 million from his employer to a DeFi platform, leading to significant company losses and layoffs. After investments collapsed, he confessed and was subsequently fired.

Decrypt5h ago

Justin Sun Settles $10M Lawsuit With SEC, Ending Legal Dispute

Justin Sun and the U.S. SEC have settled a $10M lawsuit that began in March 2023, resolving claims of market manipulation in the Tron ecosystem. This settlement closes a lengthy legal battle, providing relief to the crypto sector and fostering improved relations between blockchain projects and regulators.

BlockChainReporter8h ago

Trump signs executive order to combat cybercrime, requiring multiple agencies to submit action plans within 120 days

U.S. President Trump signed an executive order on March 6th to combat cybercrime and fraud, requiring relevant ministers to review frameworks and develop action plans. The order establishes an action team to coordinate the fight against transnational cybercrime and proposes a victim recovery plan to compensate victims of online fraud. At the same time, it calls for negotiations with countries that tolerate such crimes and measures to restrict them.

GateNews11h ago

Hong Kong Sheung Wan Money Exchange Customer Robbed at Knifepoint, Police Arrest Suspect Through Early Deployment

Recently, a knife robbery occurred in Sheung Wan, Hong Kong. Two victims were robbed after exchanging approximately 10 million HKD at a currency exchange shop. The police successfully apprehended the suspect, and the victims did not suffer any property loss. This is the third major cash robbery in the area within three months. The police have begun investigating the connection between the cases and the background of the criminal group.

GateNews18h ago

Pan Gongsheng: Continue to intensify the crackdown on illegal financial activities such as virtual currency speculation, with a focus on financial risk containment

People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng stated at the National People's Congress that over the past year, financial risks have been orderly resolved, and the financial system has operated stably. In the future, efforts will continue to combat illegal financial activities, prevent financial risks, and closely monitor the impact of external shocks.

GateNews20h ago

U.S. Federal Court Dismisses Terrorism-Related Lawsuit Against a CEX and Its Founders

A U.S. judge dismissed a civil lawsuit accusing a certain exchange and its founders of colluding with a terrorist organization to carry out an attack. The plaintiff failed to prove that the defendants intentionally collaborated with terrorists. The judge criticized the complaint for being lengthy but allowed for amendments, and the exchange firmly denied the allegations.

GateNews21h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments