Bitcoin Shark "Accumulation" Mostly Reshuffling, Not Demand

Bitcoinistcom
BTC-3,36%
ETH-4,27%

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure Senior researcher at on-chain analytics firm Glassnode has explained how the recent Bitcoin shark “accumulation” is not a sign of organic buying.

Bitcoin Shark-Sized Entities Have Been Growing Recently

In a new post on X, Glassnode senior researcher CryptoVizArt.₿ has talked about the recent growth in the supply attached to the Bitcoin sharks. “Sharks” are defined as the entities carrying between 100 and 1,000 BTC.

Related Reading: BitMine Goes Shopping As Ethereum Dips: $140M Buy Spotted On-ChainAt the current exchange rate, the range of this cohort converts to $8.7 million at the lower end and $87 million at the upper one. Due to the significant size involved, sharks are considered as a investor group, although they are less influential than the whales (1,000+ BTC).

Lately, the supply of the sharks has been following a rapid upward trajectory, as the chart shared by CryptoVizArt.₿ shows.

Bitcoin Shark Netflow

How the supply of the sharks has changed during the last few months | Source: @CryptoVizArt on X

Since November 16th, the Bitcoin sharks have seen their combined balance change from 3.33 million BTC to 3.60 million BTC, reflecting a significant rise of 270,000 tokens. “The key question, however, is whether this reflects genuine net accumulation, or merely internal reshuffling across cohorts, a distinction only deeper on-chain analysis can resolve,” said the Glassnode researcher.

By “reshuffling,” CryptoVizArt.₿ is referring to the merging or splitting of holdings that investors sometimes take part in. For example, a whale deciding to break their balance across multiple wallets can register as a decrease in the whale supply, and an increase in the supply of whatever bracket the smaller holdings fall inside.

Signs point to something similar being a factor behind the recent Bitcoin shark supply increase. Below is another chart shared by the analyst, this one comparing the trend in the supply of the 100,000+ BTC entities against that of the sharks.

Bitcoin Large Entities

Looks like the two supplies have gone opposite ways in recent weeks | Source: @CryptoVizArt on X

The 100,000+ BTC cohort corresponds to the largest of entities on the blockchain, including exchanges, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and custodial services. From the graph, it’s apparent that the holdings of this group have been declining recently.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Speculative Activity Cooling Fast: IFP Shows Steep SlideInterestingly, the amount distributed by the cohort in this drawdown is 300,000 BTC, which is roughly equal to that accumulated by the sharks (270,000 BTC). “This pattern strongly points to wallet reshuffling, not organic accumulation,” noted CryptoVizArt.₿.

Since the 100,000+ BTC bracket also includes exchanges, reshuffling out of these platforms (that is, withdrawals) can still point toward positive accumulation. It turns out, however, that the nature of the reshuffling is truly likely to be internal, as Coinbase made internal wallet transfers amounting to a massive 640,000 BTC alongside this trend.

Bitcoin Coinbase Internal Transfers

The trend in the total internal transfer volume of crypto exchange Coinbase | Source: @CryptoVizArt on X

Based on the data, the analyst has concluded:

The key takeaway is that >90% of the apparent “shark accumulation” is likely driven by internal reshuffling by large custodial entities, rather than net buying by new 100–1K BTC holders.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is floating around $87,300, down over 3% in the last seven days.

Bitcoin Price Chart

The price of the coin seems to have gone through some volatility | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Featured image from Dall-E, Glassnode.com, chart from TradingView.com Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

BTC breaks through $68,000, down 0.72% intraday

Gate News Report, March 7th, BTC broke through the $68,000 mark, down 0.72% for the day.

GateNews38m ago

Bitcoin spot ETF experienced a total net outflow of $349 million yesterday, with none of the twelve ETFs showing net inflow.

On March 6th, Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced a total net outflow of $349 million, with Fidelity ETF FBTC net outflows of $159 million and BlackRock ETF IBIT net outflows of $143 million. The current total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETFs is $87.075 billion.

GateNews46m ago

Rumble latest financial report: holds 210.82 BTC, Tether commits $150 million for GPU service procurement

Rumble disclosed in its latest financial report that it holds 210.82 Bitcoins and $237.9 million in cash, with liquidity reaching $256.4 million. Tether will pay it $100 million in advertising fees and provide up to $150 million in GPU service procurement commitments to strengthen AI infrastructure collaboration.

GateNews1h ago

Arthur Hayes: The market underestimates the risk of Middle East conflict; AI replacing human labor could trigger a credit crisis

Maelstrom Co-Founder Arthur Hayes warns that the risk of Middle East conflict is underestimated, and disruptions in energy flows could trigger a global economic crisis. He also mentioned that the rapid replacement of labor by artificial intelligence could lead to a credit crisis, calling for attention to liquidity issues in the financial system.

GateNews1h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments