Author: Huang Wenjing, He Weiyi
Introduction
As global anti-money laundering standards tighten and China's new Anti-Money Laundering Law is implemented, cryptocurrency crimes have exhibited characteristics of "high frequency, high amounts, and high concealment." From early fake trading platforms to now using smart contracts for on-chain phishing and fragmented money laundering, victims face not only asset losses but also difficulties in rights protection due to information gaps and challenges in providing evidence.
However, in judicial practice, victims generally face a core dilemma: knowing that funds are "still on the chain," but finding it difficult to push public security authorities to complete seizure, freezing, and disposal. This is often due to incomplete evidence materials, unclear reporting statements, and insufficient communication and cooperation, leading to missed optimal investigation opportunities.
This article combines the latest judicial practices and technical methods to provide victims with a clear and feasible response pathway, helping to break the deadlock in recovery efforts.
Possibility of On-Chain Asset Tracking
First point: How does the law view your cryptocurrency loss