US Banks Chase Bitcoin FOMO: Morgan Stanley and Other Giants Race to File Crypto ETF Applications

Markets
Updated: 2026-01-07 05:44

Morgan Stanley filed applications for spot Bitcoin and Solana ETFs on January 5, 2026, marking another major milestone following Bank of America’s move to allow clients to allocate to cryptocurrencies. Starting in January 2026, Bank of America authorized its more than 15,000 financial advisors to proactively recommend that clients allocate 1% to 4% of their portfolios to cryptocurrencies, with a particular focus on four spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Driven by a supportive regulatory environment and surging client demand, traditional financial institutions are accelerating their embrace of digital assets to avoid missing out on this rapidly emerging asset class.

Institutional Moves

Major U.S. financial institutions are entering the crypto asset space at an unprecedented pace. Morgan Stanley’s ETF applications signal a shift: traditional finance giants are now directly participating in issuing crypto products, rather than simply providing third-party access. The bank, which manages $1.6 trillion in assets, filed S-1 documents seeking to launch its own spot Bitcoin and Solana ETFs—marking the first time a major bank has attempted to issue such products.

Bank of America’s policy shift is equally noteworthy. Beginning January 5, 2026, the bank will allow wealth management clients to allocate 1% to 4% of their portfolios to crypto assets. Chris Hyzy, Chief Investment Officer of Bank of America Private Bank, stated: "For investors who are passionate about thematic innovation and can tolerate high volatility, a moderate allocation of 1%-4% to digital assets is an appropriate choice."

This move brings Bank of America in line with its competitor, Morgan Stanley, which had already advised investors to allocate 2%-4% to crypto assets as early as October 2025.

Strategic Positioning

Traditional financial institutions are not taking a one-dimensional approach to crypto; instead, they are pursuing multi-layered strategic initiatives. These banks are catering to diverse client needs through a range of service models, from simple product access to deep involvement in market infrastructure.

Bank of America chose to start with wealth management, enabling clients to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies through regulated ETFs. The bank’s CIO team covers Bitcoin ETFs including the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB), Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC), and BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). Morgan Stanley has taken an even bolder step by directly applying to issue its own spot Bitcoin and Solana ETFs. This shift from distribution to issuance demonstrates growing confidence among major banks in the crypto asset sector.

Meanwhile, several banks are developing more advanced crypto services. Citibank plans to launch crypto custody services by 2026. Charles Schwab has set a timeline to roll out spot trading for Bitcoin and Ethereum, targeting a mid-2026 launch.

Drivers

Multiple factors are fueling the rush of traditional banks into crypto. A significantly improved regulatory environment has provided a clear path for institutional participation. In September 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved universal listing standards for crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs), shortening the product listing cycle to 75 days.

More importantly, the SEC removed crypto-specific review items from its 2026 examination priorities, signaling a shift from strict scrutiny to routine oversight. SEC Chair Paul Atkins commented: "The examination priorities released today should enable firms to have constructive dialogue with SEC examiners."

Strong client demand is another major driver. Nancy Fahmy, Head of Investment Solutions at Bank of America, noted: "This policy update reflects the continued growth in client demand for digital asset allocation." In response, three of the four largest U.S. brokerages have lifted restrictions on crypto investments. Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo Advisors have all opened channels for crypto asset investments.

Market Opportunities and Capital Potential

The crypto push by U.S. financial institutions is backed by enormous market opportunities and capital potential. Statistics show Bank of America serves around 70 million clients and manages over $2 trillion in assets, while Vanguard oversees 50 million accounts with $11 trillion in assets. If these clients were to allocate just 1% of their portfolios to crypto assets, it could result in approximately $130 billion in new inflows—more than doubling the total inflows into U.S. spot crypto ETFs since their inception.

Bitwise forecasts that over 100 crypto-related ETFs will launch in 2026. This ETF boom will further cement the market leadership of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, but could present a serious "stress test" for other cryptocurrencies.

Bloomberg Senior ETF Analyst James Seyffart supports this outlook but also warns: "We’re going to see a lot of ETF liquidations." This dynamic of "explosive growth and rapid shakeout" is set to define the next phase of crypto ETF development.

Market Competition and Potential Risks

As more players enter the market, the crypto ETF space faces intensifying competition and concentration risk. Currently, Coinbase holds assets for the vast majority of crypto ETFs, commanding an 85% share of the global Bitcoin ETF market. In Q3 2025, Coinbase’s custodial assets reached $300 billion. This concentration of custody introduces systemic risk, prompting U.S. Bank to restart its institutional Bitcoin custody program, while Citigroup and State Street are also exploring crypto ETF custody partnerships.

High-fee, redundant products are under pressure to exit the market. As the space becomes more crowded, issuers are expected to further lower flagship product fees, making high-fee, duplicative products uncompetitive. Seyffart predicts a wave of crypto ETF closures between late 2026 and early 2027. Funds with less than $50 million in assets, unable to cover costs, typically shut down within two years.

Asset Performance and Market Outlook

Major crypto assets have shown divergent performance amid accelerated institutional adoption. As of January 7, 2026, Gate market data shows Bitcoin (BTC) trading at around $87,000, down from its all-time high of over $126,000 set in early October 2025. The crypto market has diverged from traditional financial markets: year to date, the Bitcoin price has fallen about 7%, while the S&P 500 Index has gained more than 15% over the same period.

The proliferation of ETFs could further intensify market segmentation. For less liquid underlying assets, available funding may dry up completely during periods of volatility, forcing ETFs to halt creations and causing products to trade at a premium until supply resumes. For mainstream assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, more ETF products will deepen the "spot-derivatives linkage," narrow price spreads, and reinforce their status as "core institutional collateral."

When news broke that Morgan Stanley had filed for Bitcoin and Solana ETFs, the traditional finance sector responded not with skepticism or resistance, but with a sense of urgency to catch up. Vanguard opened its platform to third-party crypto ETFs and mutual funds, while Charles Schwab set a timeline to launch spot trading for Bitcoin and Ethereum. Coinbase currently holds 85% of global Bitcoin ETF assets, but U.S. Bank, Citigroup, and State Street are racing to develop competing custody services. The market expects more than 100 crypto-related ETFs to launch in 2026, though analysts warn that a significant portion could be eliminated within two years. This landscape is no longer just a playground for speculators—it has become an asset class that the $13 trillion wealth management industry is taking seriously.

The content herein does not constitute any offer, solicitation, or recommendation. You should always seek independent professional advice before making any investment decisions. Please note that Gate may restrict or prohibit the use of all or a portion of the Services from Restricted Locations. For more information, please read the User Agreement
Like the Content