I’m currently looking at the project “Trustworthy or Not,” and I’m not superstitious about those few lines on the official website. I check GitHub and the audit reports first... but I don’t pretend to understand the code. For someone like me who’s just doing grind-and-get-paid daily tasks, the real signals are: whether the code updates are consistent, whether commits look like real people are actively working; audits aren’t something you finish just by slapping on a logo—at least check whether they’ve actually fixed the high-risk issues. When it comes to upgrading permissions, it’s most likely to be a pitfall if you don’t know: how many signatures are required for multi-sig, whether it’s decentralized, and whether you can change rules with one click.

Honestly, I’ve also gotten numb watching those chain games that crash economically—once inflation starts, studios rush in, and coin prices spiral. In many cases, it’s not that the gameplay is bad; it’s that permissions are too centralized and parameter changes are too casual. Anyway, before I do any tasks, I go over these signals first, so I don’t end up stuck in the mix like the final “supporting bystander” after a whole bunch of interactions.