Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught up on what's happening with the crypto US market structure bill negotiations, and it's actually looking pretty solid right now. Senator Cynthia Lummis, who chairs the digital assets subcommittee over at the Senate Banking Committee, basically said they've cracked the code on the stablecoin yield issue that's been holding everything up.
So here's the backstory - crypto platforms and banks have been going back and forth on how stablecoin reward programs should work. The banking lobby was worried these yields would compete with traditional deposit accounts, which kicked off a whole chain reaction that nearly killed the bill. But Lummis says they've worked out the compromise language now. Essentially, crypto platforms won't be able to use banking terminology when describing their stablecoin rewards - no more talking about "yields" or tying payouts to how much you hold.
Lummis made it clear at the Digital Chamber's DC Blockchain Summit that they're targeting late April to get this out of committee. She's pretty confident about the timeline, saying "We think we've got it" and they're really going to push it through banking committee in April. Interestingly, Brian Armstrong from Coinbase apparently came around on this compromise after initially pushing back on earlier versions.
But here's where it gets interesting for the broader crypto US policy landscape - Senator Kirsten Gillibrand raised another issue at the same event. Democrats want to add ethics provisions that would prevent government officials from personally profiting from crypto industry connections. This is clearly aimed at making sure nobody uses their position to get rich off the sector. Gillibrand said including this could actually unlock more Democratic votes on the bill.
Other sticking points on DeFi security language have already been worked out too. The process involves White House coordination, and senators Bernie Moreno, Angela Alsobrooks, and Thom Tillis are in the final stages of negotiations. Once they all sign off, it's basically game on for moving forward.
Lummis is saying they'll get this done by end of year no matter what, though the Senate schedule is pretty chaotic right now with other legislative battles brewing. But if this markup happens in late April like planned, it's the second committee approval needed - the Agriculture Committee already passed their version earlier. After that, it goes into a combined version for a potential full Senate vote.
This is probably the most significant crypto US legislative push we've seen in a while, so worth keeping tabs on how it develops over the next few months.