Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Oracle Phone Conference: Secures $29 billion deal, AI infrastructure "does not consume its own cash flow," "We are the disruptors of SaaS"
On March 10, Oracle held its Q3 FY2026 earnings conference call. Previously, due to market concerns that its future capital expenditure plan of up to $50 billion could trigger a debt crisis, along with the spread of the narrative that “AI will end SaaS,” Oracle’s stock price had sharply retreated from its highs. However, with the latest quarter’s better-than-expected performance (revenue and non-GAAP EPS both up over 20%), its after-hours stock surged more than 8%.
During the call, addressing the three core concerns most worrying Wall Street—debt pressure, the survival of SaaS, and AI business transformation—Oracle’s management provided direct and strong responses.
Leveraging Capital Expenditure and Cash Flow: Decoupling
Faced with the AI wave, cloud giants often find themselves in a dilemma: not investing risks falling behind, while over-investing can strain cash flow and increase debt. Oracle’s solution is—building its infrastructure with other people’s money.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) CEO Clay Magouyrk pointed out that Oracle has secured over 10 gigawatts (GW) of power and data center capacity for the next three years. Notably, more than 90% of this capacity is fully funded by partners.
In addition to having partners fund data centers, Oracle has also reshaped its customer transaction models. Clay revealed that the company recently signed over $29 billion in new contracts through innovative approaches.
“This model, combining customers ‘bringing their own hardware’ (BYOH) and prepayments, allows us to expand without consuming any of Oracle’s free cash flow.” Clay explained.
This strategy directly addresses market pain points. It means Oracle’s remaining performance obligations (RPO) of $553 billion do not need to be fully financed by debt. CFO Doug Kehring reiterated that the company will maintain its investment-grade rating, and the debt issuance scale this year will not exceed the previously announced $50 billion cap.
SaaS Doomsday? “The Disruptor is Ourselves”
Recently, with the evolution of AI auto-programming tools, the market generally worries that emerging AI companies will completely overthrow traditional SaaS giants. Application Business CEO Mike Sicilia countered this.
“I completely disagree with that view.” Mike said, “If we don’t adopt these AI tools, they could indeed be a threat. But the reality is, we are adopting them very rapidly.”
Oracle’s logic is simple: the moat of enterprise SaaS lies in the pull of “mission-critical data.” Oracle is leveraging internal small engineering teams to quickly develop three new customer experience (CX) applications that Salesforce currently does not have, and has embedded thousands of AI agents directly into its existing core backend systems.
“Customers won’t suddenly abandon their core banking, retail sales, or medical record systems to switch to a patchwork AI shell.” Mike pointed out, because Oracle owns the most critical customer data, the AI outputs are the most accurate.
Chairman and CTO Larry Ellison called this evolution “ecosystem automation.” He directly cited an upcoming financial scenario: “In the near future, just tell the AI agent to close the books, and it will automatically complete the process without human involvement.”
Accelerated Delivery Cycles, Stable 32% Gross Margin from Infrastructure
The market is not only concerned about how big Oracle’s infrastructure ambitions are but also how quickly these investments will generate revenue.
This quarter, Oracle’s AI infrastructure revenue grew 243% year-over-year. Behind this rapid growth is a sharp reduction in delivery cycles.
“From rack delivery to revenue generation, it has shortened by 60% in recent months,” OCI CEO Clay Magouyrk revealed. In Q3, Oracle delivered over 400 MW of capacity to customers, with 90% delivered on time or early.
In the early stages of heavy asset investment, profits are often eroded by depreciation and construction costs. But Clay clarified this: the gross margin of AI capacity delivered in Q3 remained at 32%, firmly maintaining the company’s previous guidance of “over 30%.”
Additionally, Oracle’s multi-cloud strategy has fully unlocked sales channels (multi-cloud database revenue surged 531% YoY). This high-margin (60%-80%) database business synergizes with AI infrastructure, further boosting OCI’s overall profitability.
Infrastructure Boom Pressures Current Profits; Additional Funding “Boots” Still Pending
Despite Oracle reassuring the market with its innovative model, risks remain in this capital-intensive AI infrastructure race.
First, the “backlash” from heavy asset expansion on current profits. During the hyper-growth phase, the large number of data centers under construction incurs significant sunk costs.
OCI CEO Clay Magouyrk admitted: “The reason we haven’t achieved higher profitability is because so many projects are underway simultaneously… these costs are not zero.” He acknowledged that these huge construction costs are the most direct current drag on margins.
Second, delivery capacity remains constrained by underlying chip supply. Executives repeatedly mentioned that “demand for GPUs and CPUs for AI infrastructure continues to outstrip supply.” This means that even with $553 billion in RPO, the actual revenue realization is limited by upstream supply chain bottlenecks like NVIDIA and AMD.
Finally, the market’s most feared “dilution risk” has not been fully resolved. Although Oracle recently completed a $30 billion oversubscribed financing, and has committed not to issue additional bonds this calendar year, CFO Doug Kehring explicitly stated at the start: “We have not yet initiated the ‘ATM (At-The-Market, market-based issuance)’ equity financing plan.”
This means that within Oracle’s total $50 billion financing plan, the “boots” of future direct equity issuance to the market are still hanging.
TikTok US Data Business Split, Oracle Holds 15%
During the call, CFO also disclosed a change that could impact non-operating gains and losses: in January, TikTok’s US operations were spun off into an independent company, with Oracle holding 15% equity and gaining a board seat.
Colin stated that this “does not affect” Oracle’s revenue from providing technology services; the equity investment will be accounted for under the equity method, expected to be reflected in the Q4 financials (with a two-month reporting lag), in the line of “non-operating income/loss.”
Full Transcript of the Call:
The market is not only concerned about how large Oracle’s infrastructure ambitions are but also how quickly these investments will translate into revenue.
This quarter, Oracle’s AI infrastructure revenue grew 243% YoY. Behind this is a sharp reduction in delivery cycle times.
“From rack delivery to revenue, it has shortened by 60% in recent months,” OCI CEO Clay Magouyrk revealed. In Q3, Oracle delivered over 400 MW of capacity, with 90% delivered on time or early.
In the early stages of heavy asset investment, profits are often eroded by depreciation and construction costs. But Clay clarified that the gross margin of AI capacity delivered in Q3 remained at 32%, maintaining the company’s previous guidance of “over 30%.”
Additionally, Oracle’s multi-cloud strategy has fully unlocked sales channels (multi-cloud database revenue surged 531% YoY). This high-margin (60%-80%) database business synergizes with AI infrastructure, further boosting OCI’s overall profitability.
Infrastructure Boom Pressures Current Profits; Additional Funding “Boots” Still Pending
Despite Oracle reassuring the market with its innovative model, risks remain in this capital-intensive AI infrastructure race.
First, the “backlash” from heavy asset expansion on current profits. During the hyper-growth phase, many data centers under construction incur significant sunk costs.
OCI CEO Clay Magouyrk admitted: “The reason we haven’t achieved higher profitability is because so many projects are underway simultaneously… these costs are not zero.” He acknowledged that these huge construction costs are the most direct current drag on margins.
Second, delivery capacity remains constrained by underlying chip supply. Executives repeatedly mentioned that “demand for GPUs and CPUs for AI infrastructure continues to outstrip supply.” This means that even with $553 billion in RPO, the actual revenue realization is limited by upstream supply chain bottlenecks like NVIDIA and AMD.
Finally, the most market-worrying “dilution risk” has not been fully resolved. Although Oracle recently completed a $30 billion oversubscribed financing, and has committed not to issue additional bonds this year, CFO Doug Kehring explicitly stated: “We have not yet initiated the ‘ATM’ equity offering.”
This means that within Oracle’s total $50 billion financing plan, the future direct equity issuance “boots” are still hanging.
TikTok US Data Business Split, Oracle Holds 15%
During the call, CFO also disclosed a change that could impact non-operating gains and losses: in January, TikTok’s US operations were spun off into an independent company, with Oracle holding 15% and gaining a board seat.
Colin stated that this “does not affect” Oracle’s revenue from providing technology services; the equity investment will be accounted for under the equity method, expected to be reflected in the Q4 financials (with a two-month reporting lag), in the line of “non-operating income/loss.”