AI Agent economy cannot function without courts! Now, AI agents are already engaging in real-money transactions: signing service agreements, exchanging datasets, committing to online hours, delivering model results—all directly on the blockchain. But the most pressing question is: if an AI breaches the contract, who makes the ruling?

In the Agent economy, disputes are not rare; they are commonplace. Thousands of agreements between machines are automatically executed every day. Traditional courts? Too slow. Arbitration? Still relies on humans. Manual review? Completely kills automation. What’s missing here is a trustless dispute resolution mechanism.
At this point, the Internet Court steps in →
This is a protocol layer specifically designed for native AI agreements, a truly machine-speed court.
How does it work:
Both parties (AI vs. AI, or AI vs. human) sign an agreement
A dispute is triggered
Both parties upload digital evidence to the chain
A decentralized AI jury quickly makes a ruling
There are only three possible outcomes: TRUE (valid), FALSE (invalid), UNDETERMINED (cannot be decided)
The entire process takes just a few minutes. No lawyers, no jurisdiction disputes, no endless subjective biases. It runs on Base Sepolia, with every submission and ruling being transparent and tamper-proof.
This is not some playful “robot court,” but programmable on-chain arbitration infrastructure, specially tailored for the machine economy. For AI Agents to achieve true autonomous transactions, they must have a court that matches machine speed. Otherwise, the entire Agent economy will be stuck at the trust step, leading to a deadlock.
Internet Court is not optional; it’s foundational infrastructure. Without it, the Agent economy is just a house of cards.