Himalayan Kingdom Bhutan, through its Special Administrative Region Glep Meditation City, has launched a policy that has shaken the blockchain industry — mandatorily linking the digital nomad visa with the gold-backed token TER on the Solana blockchain. This is not only an innovation in immigration products but also a radical experiment where a sovereign nation places blockchain assets at the core of its policy.
In simple terms, applicants need to pay a non-refundable administrative fee of $2,800 and hold $10,000 worth of TER tokens to obtain a Bhutan residence permit for up to 36 months. TER is not an ordinary meme coin; it is issued by Bhutan’s special zone, with each token anchored to 0.01 grams of physical gold stored in a Bhutanese bank vault, technically deployed on the Solana public chain.
From an investment perspective, TER possesses three attributes: the hedging value of gold, Bhutan’s sovereign credit endorsement, and the potential empowerment of the Solana ecosystem. Holding TER is equivalent to holding tokenized gold, with an added “ticket” for long-term residence. However, the risks of this investment are also significant: as a new RWA (Real-World Asset), TER’s secondary market liquidity is limited; physical gold is stored in Bhutanese banks, whose security and insurance coverage cannot compare to top vaults in London or Switzerland; Bhutan’s economy is small and highly dependent on India, with potential sovereign credit fluctuations; additionally, whether the infrastructure in the special zone can meet the digital nomads’ internet and healthcare needs remains uncertain.
Bhutan’s choice of Solana over Ethereum is driven by its high throughput and low transaction costs, aiming to make TER a daily circulation tool within the GMC zone. Institutions like Nansen have announced their presence, indicating that infrastructure support is underway. However, the SOL token price has decoupled from the ecosystem’s positive outlook, reflecting macro liquidity tightening.
For blockchain practitioners, the appeal of this visa lies in its use of on-chain asset holdings to replace traditional proof of monthly income. If you already have a need to hold gold and yearn for the tranquility beneath the Himalayas, this could be a two-birds-one-stone option. But if your goal is just to save on rent or speculate on TER arbitrage, you should be cautious of exchange rate fluctuations, liquidity discounts, and policy risks.
In the long run, Bhutan’s experiment may usher in a new era of “sovereign digital contracts”: residence rights are no longer just a piece of paper issued by the government but are programmable rights that can interact with on-chain assets. Regardless of success or failure, this provides a model for small countries to attract crypto talent. The ultimate conclusion is that the value of the Bhutan model lies not in how many immigrants it attracts but in whether it can demonstrate that individuals and nations can form a new, more rigid, and lower-trust relationship through transparent blockchain technology, surpassing traditional immigration contracts.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Himalayan Kingdom Bhutan, through its Special Administrative Region Glep Meditation City, has launched a policy that has shaken the blockchain industry — mandatorily linking the digital nomad visa with the gold-backed token TER on the Solana blockchain. This is not only an innovation in immigration products but also a radical experiment where a sovereign nation places blockchain assets at the core of its policy.
In simple terms, applicants need to pay a non-refundable administrative fee of $2,800 and hold $10,000 worth of TER tokens to obtain a Bhutan residence permit for up to 36 months. TER is not an ordinary meme coin; it is issued by Bhutan’s special zone, with each token anchored to 0.01 grams of physical gold stored in a Bhutanese bank vault, technically deployed on the Solana public chain.
From an investment perspective, TER possesses three attributes: the hedging value of gold, Bhutan’s sovereign credit endorsement, and the potential empowerment of the Solana ecosystem. Holding TER is equivalent to holding tokenized gold, with an added “ticket” for long-term residence. However, the risks of this investment are also significant: as a new RWA (Real-World Asset), TER’s secondary market liquidity is limited; physical gold is stored in Bhutanese banks, whose security and insurance coverage cannot compare to top vaults in London or Switzerland; Bhutan’s economy is small and highly dependent on India, with potential sovereign credit fluctuations; additionally, whether the infrastructure in the special zone can meet the digital nomads’ internet and healthcare needs remains uncertain.
Bhutan’s choice of Solana over Ethereum is driven by its high throughput and low transaction costs, aiming to make TER a daily circulation tool within the GMC zone. Institutions like Nansen have announced their presence, indicating that infrastructure support is underway. However, the SOL token price has decoupled from the ecosystem’s positive outlook, reflecting macro liquidity tightening.
For blockchain practitioners, the appeal of this visa lies in its use of on-chain asset holdings to replace traditional proof of monthly income. If you already have a need to hold gold and yearn for the tranquility beneath the Himalayas, this could be a two-birds-one-stone option. But if your goal is just to save on rent or speculate on TER arbitrage, you should be cautious of exchange rate fluctuations, liquidity discounts, and policy risks.
In the long run, Bhutan’s experiment may usher in a new era of “sovereign digital contracts”: residence rights are no longer just a piece of paper issued by the government but are programmable rights that can interact with on-chain assets. Regardless of success or failure, this provides a model for small countries to attract crypto talent. The ultimate conclusion is that the value of the Bhutan model lies not in how many immigrants it attracts but in whether it can demonstrate that individuals and nations can form a new, more rigid, and lower-trust relationship through transparent blockchain technology, surpassing traditional immigration contracts.