Following earlier actions to remove reputation risk from its supervision of banks, Federal Reserve Board requests comment on proposal to codify that removal
Following earlier actions to remove reputation risk from its supervision of banks, the Federal Reserve Board on Monday requested comment on a proposal to codify that removal. The proposal reiterates the Board’s policy against penalizing or prohibiting an institution from banking a customer engaged in legal activity.
“We have heard troubling cases of debanking—where supervisors use concerns about reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers because of their political views, religious beliefs, or involvement in disfavored but lawful businesses,” said Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman. “Discrimination by financial institutions on these bases is unlawful and does not have a role in the Federal Reserve’s supervisory framework.”
In June, the Board announced that reputation risk would no longer be a component of examination programs in its supervision of banks. This proposal would build on that announcement to help ensure supervisory decisions are based on material financial risks, as well as increase clarity and facilitate greater precision in supervisory decision making. It would also support the Board’s focus on core financial risk in its supervision of banks.
This change does not alter the Board’s expectation that banks maintain strong risk management to ensure safety and soundness and compliance with law and regulation.
Comments are due within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
For media inquiries, please email [email protected] or call 202-452-2955.
Federal Register notice: Prohibition on Use of Reputation Risk or Other Supervisory Tools to Encourage or Compel Banking Organizations to Engage in Politicized or Unlawful Discrimination (PDF)
Board memo (PDF)
Statement by Vice Chair for Supervision Bowman
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Following earlier actions to remove reputation risk from its supervision of banks, Federal Reserve Board requests comment on proposal to codify that removal
Following earlier actions to remove reputation risk from its supervision of banks, the Federal Reserve Board on Monday requested comment on a proposal to codify that removal. The proposal reiterates the Board’s policy against penalizing or prohibiting an institution from banking a customer engaged in legal activity.
“We have heard troubling cases of debanking—where supervisors use concerns about reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers because of their political views, religious beliefs, or involvement in disfavored but lawful businesses,” said Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman. “Discrimination by financial institutions on these bases is unlawful and does not have a role in the Federal Reserve’s supervisory framework.”
In June, the Board announced that reputation risk would no longer be a component of examination programs in its supervision of banks. This proposal would build on that announcement to help ensure supervisory decisions are based on material financial risks, as well as increase clarity and facilitate greater precision in supervisory decision making. It would also support the Board’s focus on core financial risk in its supervision of banks.
This change does not alter the Board’s expectation that banks maintain strong risk management to ensure safety and soundness and compliance with law and regulation.
Comments are due within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
For media inquiries, please email [email protected] or call 202-452-2955.
Federal Register notice: Prohibition on Use of Reputation Risk or Other Supervisory Tools to Encourage or Compel Banking Organizations to Engage in Politicized or Unlawful Discrimination (PDF)
Board memo (PDF)
Statement by Vice Chair for Supervision Bowman