Hello, although you claim that it has nothing to do with overseas BlockFocus, this completely contradicts the business registration, equity structure, and actual operations: the actual controller, the person responsible for actual management, and the business executor. The behavioral responsibility is clear, and their verbal denial of any connection to overseas BlockFocus has no legal effect.

1. As the sole individual shareholder and controlling all four roles in Beijing ErGou Culture, the company is controlled by Hong Kong ErGou Technology, which is under the same actual controller as BlockFocus, holding 51%; they are part of the same control system;
2. The entities controlled by him, such as XinWan Mutual Mapping, are the only business execution entities of BlockFocus in mainland China, with no third-party involvement;
3. There are no other branches or responsible persons within the country, and BlockFocus’s operations in China can only be managed by the person in charge of ErGou’s domestic company;
4. The difference in the registered name used in business registration does not affect the determination of legal responsibility.
In summary, it is legally recognized that the person in charge of ErGou’s domestic company is the actual person responsible, operational controller, and business executor for overseas BlockFocus in mainland China. Their verbal denial has no legal validity.