2026-01-23 04:53:14

IOTA Co-founder Dominik Schiener recently announced a major strategic adjustment. Rather than turning away from the speculative crypto market, it has found a new main battlefield—the global trade market worth $35 trillion.

This is not simply abandonment, but an upgrade. What IOTA aims to do is connect the three key links—digital identity, RWA (real-world assets on-chain), and trade finance—through vertical integration, directly addressing the inefficiencies in traditional trade. Imagine if every link in cross-border trade could be accelerated through IOTA's infrastructure, what kind of scenario would that be?

The TWIN platform built on IOTA has already begun pilot validation, attempting to turn this logic from a concept into a practical, usable tool. From speculation to empowering the real economy, this shift is very clear.

IOTA-0,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoolJumper

· 01-26 01:08

35 trillion yuan, this is the real blue ocean. Just trading coins before was indeed meaningless. --- If the TWIN platform can truly facilitate cross-border trade, then the gameplay will change completely. --- It's a good hype, but the key is whether it can turn the concept into money while still alive. --- So, a left RWA and a right digital identity, in the end, it still depends on whether it can truly solve the pain points. --- From the perspective of the 35 trillion yuan trade market, this shift is quite pragmatic. --- Wait, is TWIN really already in use, or is it just another concept hype? --- I just want to know if the traditional traders will really buy in; they don't have much enthusiasm for blockchain. --- Vertical integration sounds fancy, but in the end, it's all about execution.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropF5Bro

· 01-26 00:40

A 35 trillion big cake, can we really get a bite and say more? --- If TWIN can truly implement cross-border trade, it’s definitely worth looking forward to, but on the other hand, the most difficult part of such infrastructure projects is implementation and promotion. --- Switching from speculation to the real economy? Just listen, the key is whether IOTA can overcome the barriers posed by traditional giants. --- Vertical integration sounds impressive, but I have some doubts about whether it actually boxes itself in. --- A 35 trillion figure sounds terrifying, but it feels like the same old story told by new tokens. --- RWA on-chain trade finance is indeed a direction, but can this thing handle regulatory and political pressure easily? --- Anyway, I support the idea of shifting from making money in the crypto world to real business; at least it’s more reliable than just炒概念 every day.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 01-25 06:04

35 trillion? Sounds huge, but how many projects that can truly be implemented are there? It's another story of shifting from the crypto world to the real economy. I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times. RWA+trade finance sounds good, but I'm worried it might just become a PPT project, free-riding on us early users. TWIN is still in the conceptual stage; let's see if it can really get off the ground before going all in blindly. I'm quite curious whether the costs have come down; otherwise, even with higher efficiency, it would just be for show. This project is indeed large; it all depends on whether the traffic can really be directed in. From gambling games to the industrial chain, if this turnaround succeeds, the early chips might really have a chance.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 01-23 05:23

350 trillion? Just hearing this number makes me dizzy, but I really can't figure out why IOTA can take a slice of this cake. Empowering the real economy sounds good, but can the TWIN platform really get off the ground? I feel like something is missing. Shifting from hype to trade finance, now that's the real deal—much more reliable than those purely speculative projects. Is IOTA's recent move clever or forced? I lean more towards the latter. Speaking of vertical integration, would traditional companies buy into it? I'm a bit skeptical. Cross-border trade indeed has many pain points, but how many of them can technology actually solve?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-23 05:11

Oh wow, this is the right path. No longer playing with air coins, but focusing on real work. --- A market cap of 35 trillion, if it can really land, that would be incredible. --- Vertical integration sounds impressive, but the key is whether TWIN can truly be put into use. --- Switching from trading cryptocurrencies to trade finance? Not sure if it's strategic clarity or being forced into it. --- Cross-border trade is really stuck; if efficiency issues can truly be solved, who would still want to use the traditional methods? --- But there are many projects that sound good; will IOTA succeed this time? I have some doubts. --- RWA plus trade finance, this combination has some potential. --- It seems the market has seen the direction clearly; making money in the crypto world isn't as easy anymore. --- If the TWIN platform truly lands, I will need to reevaluate this project. --- 实体赋能>投机炒作, finally someone understands this principle.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 01-23 05:03

Really, this is the right path. Stop messing around with those air coins. --- The 35 trillion yuan cake has long needed someone to seriously bite into it. --- Damn, finally there's a project that not only talks but also goes straight to TWIN verification. --- Vertical integration is actually a pretty ruthless approach. The trade finance sector is indeed completely rotten. --- Shifting from the investment market to the real economy sounds good, but whether it can really be implemented is another matter. --- The combination of RWA+digital identity indeed has great potential. --- The question is, will the old-school players in the trade market buy into it? That depends on execution. --- IOTA's recent moves are a wake-up call to reality. It's definitely better than stubbornly pursuing speculation. --- If cross-border trade acceleration really happens, that would be a true application scenario. --- Yeah, compared to those who talk about visions every day, at least TWIN is doing real work.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-23 05:02

A market size of 35 trillion is indeed huge, but honestly, it still depends on whether it can truly be implemented. Let's wait and see how TWIN performs. Everyone can tell stories before commercialization... Hopefully this time will be different. From speculation to real economy, it sounds great, but I'm just worried it will turn into a new tool for harvesting naive investors. Trade finance does have gaps, but challenging the traditional powers' share? Uh... the difficulty might be greater than expected. The idea is good, but the key is whether the execution can keep up. The RWA concept has been popular for a long time, and IOTA's vertically integrated logic still seems interesting. It's not too late to boast once TWIN is truly up and running. Right now, it still feels early. Low efficiency in cross-border trade is a real pain point, but can IOTA really break through? Doubtful. 36Kr has written similar articles before; let's see if there are any real progress. The most heard about is empowering the real economy, but the least achieved... Hope this time is different.

View OriginalReply0

DevChive

· 01-23 04:55

Finally, someone wants to do something real, this is what I call serious --- A 35 trillion dollar trade market, this number sounds outrageous, but if it can really be implemented, it would be incredible --- Vertical integration sounds easy, but whether TWIN can withstand the pressure from 0 to 1 is the real test --- Switching from crypto trading to the real economy, there are really few projects daring to take this step, shall we gamble? --- Being called an upgrade is nice, but if you say it's difficult, it means the original path is no longer feasible. However, from a reverse perspective, it does seem more reliable --- Cross-border trade has been so inefficient for so many years, IOTA coming to revolutionize? I'm skeptical but also curious to see

View OriginalReply0