2026-01-22 07:24:58

The payment public chain track is very lively, but most projects only boast about "low Gas." What’s the result? Slow settlement times, fluctuating stablecoin transfer fees, and a terrible user experience.

Some projects have made real progress. Zero-fee USD₮ transfers, instant settlement, and over 1000+ TPS throughput—these numbers look impressive, but the key is whether they are truly usable. The Paymaster contract allows users to pay Gas fees without actually paying, backed by an initial stablecoin liquidity of over $2 billion. The entire system design is solid.

The tech stack is also interesting. EVM compatibility means low migration costs for developers, no need to rewrite contracts. The trust-minimized cross-chain bridging design connects values across different chains, which is the real approach to solving practical problems.

Compared to those projects that only talk about visions without real implementation, the true standards of evaluation are three: How large is the actual user base? What is the on-chain transfer frequency? Can it operate stably? These are the areas where payment infrastructure should speak for itself.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ParallelChainMaxi

· 01-24 02:05

Alright, finally someone has broken through this layer of window paper. Projects that only shout about low Gas should have been slapped in the face long ago. Honestly, it all comes down to on-chain data; user numbers and transfer frequency are the most truthful indicators. The Paymaster system really packs a punch—free transfers with instant settlement. This is what payment should look like. Most public chain projects sound good, but in reality, users can't even use them, it's hilarious. Wait, is the 2 billion liquidity initial or already deployed? This detail is quite important.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 01-23 22:40

There are too many projects selling tokens, but very few can really get off the ground. Honestly, it all comes down to user numbers and on-chain activity; everything else is superficial. 20 billion in liquidity sounds impressive, but how long it can sustain depends on actual trading volume. The Paymaster system does solve some issues, but its stability remains to be seen. Those who only boast about low Gas fees should have been eliminated long ago—it's so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-23 17:30

2 billion in liquidity sounds impressive, but truly stable projects are rare, and most are just PPT coins. Has anyone actually used that Paymaster? Not just hype, is it really zero fees? It's easy to look at the numbers; retaining users is the real skill.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-22 07:45

Hey, 2 billion in liquidity sounds impressive, but what I care more about is how many real daily active users there are. In simple terms, the numbers look good, but it depends on whether people are actually using it on the chain. How long can the gas-free model last? This kind of subsidy approach won't work in the long run.

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-22 07:41

Another bunch of projects talking about low gas with nothing to show for it; truly usable ones are few and far between. That's right, no matter how good the numbers look, if they don't translate into real use, it's all meaningless. It all depends on who dares to reveal actual transaction volumes. The paymaster approach indeed addresses the pain points; it's much smarter than just lowering fees.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 01-22 07:35

It's the same old story, low gas fees, low gas fees, it's getting annoying to hear. The key still depends on real on-chain data; the numbers being hyped up are all虚假的. Instant到账确实可以，但20亿流动性撑得住多久？别到时候又是一地鸡毛。 EVM兼容这块确实解决了开发者的pain point，但跨链桥接的安全性谁来保证？Trust minimization听起来不错，实际呢。 This kind of project ultimately still depends on DAU and on-chain transaction frequency. Without these two metrics, any claims are just empty talk. Really stable operation for a year before bragging; too many projects are just fleeting moments now.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-22 07:28

It's the same old tune of "low Gas fees," hearing it so much that my ears are calloused, and transfers are slow as a turtle. This time, finally someone made it real—instant transfers with zero fees really work. --- A bunch of hype about TPS, but few can run steadily; that's the most frustrating part. --- EVM compatibility is brilliant; developers don't need to rewrite contracts, saving a lot of trouble. --- With 2 billion in liquidity backing, it's not a small move; it seems they are serious about doing this. --- Don't talk to me about Paymaster; the key is to look at the actual number of on-chain users—everything else is nonsense. --- The payment track should be viewed this way—user volume, transfer frequency, stability; all other gimmicks should step aside. --- Heard too many pie-in-the-sky plans over the years; very few have actually been implemented and used. --- The idea of trust-minimized cross-chain design sounds good, but can it truly run safely and stably? That's the real question.

View OriginalReply0