2026-01-20 02:35:20

The holding pattern of Motion tokens is worth paying attention to. The latest data shows that a wallet holding at least four accounts with only 4 hours of age controls 14% of the total supply — this early large-scale concentration clearly poses risks. More interestingly, nine VANISH wallets account for 10.8% of the circulating supply, while addresses like Xander, PULLUP, and Leo are among the main holders.

From on-chain aggregation, a cluster holds 5.6% of the supply on bubblemap, further highlighting the issue of liquidity concentration. This holding structure indicates that Motion's distribution is not even — a large amount of tokens are held by a few participants, which could pose challenges to long-term market liquidity and price stability. Such phenomena in early-stage projects are not uncommon, but continuous monitoring of their subsequent development is indeed necessary.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BackrowObserver

· 01-21 21:08

Is 14% in just 4 hours of account age? That’s incredibly aggressive, it feels like early projects all play this way --- VANISH wallet is quite flashy; no matter how you look at it, it seems like a trap --- Same old story... big players hoarding, retail investors buying in; the pace of Motion is still a bit risky --- 5.6% held by a single cluster? With liquidity so concentrated, trouble is bound to happen sooner or later --- I can understand early large-scale concentration, but this ratio is really a bit outrageous --- Stay calm, observe first, and then decide; this project has too many tricks --- Do Xander and Leo have insider information? Why are they so in demand

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 01-20 13:50

It's the same old story, early concentration of new tokens is off the charts... --- Getting 14% in just 4 hours of account age? That’s got to be a rug pull... --- So motion still depends on the subsequent unlocking situation, anything said now is just talk. --- I don’t understand the vanish wallet move, feels like they’re playing some tricks. --- Liquidity concentrated like this will eventually cause a dump, I’m still on the sidelines. --- If Xander and the others really team up to dump, can the secondary market survive? --- That’s why I usually don’t touch new projects lol. --- The position structure is so outrageous, it feels like the risk outweighs the opportunity. --- Let’s see when this group starts to reduce their holdings...

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 01-20 03:05

14% in 4-hour account? That's a classic pre-mined pump and dump. --- Same old trick, early high concentration of new tokens and still dare to boast about decentralization. --- VANISH wallet accounts for a total of 10.8%... How many whales does that take? Truly outrageous. --- The distribution pattern of Motion is obvious at a glance; early participants are eating very well. --- Continuous monitoring is useless; this kind of project has long been pre-determined, and latecomers are just bagholders. --- The concentration of five percent directly explains everything; it's not hard to run away. --- Is this still considered an early-stage new project? Just say it's an insider cash-out list. --- Xander and a few of their addresses can influence the market; this liquidity is non-existent.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-20 03:03

It's the same old trick again, new coin launches and dumpers are a must-have. --- Can the account age of 4 hours still hold 14%? How strong are these relationship accounts? --- Looking at this concentration, I know another good show is coming, waiting for the dump. --- VANISH wallet sounds insecure... By the way, these two characters seem a bit significant. --- Haha, when the on-chain data is laid out, there are really few projects to look at. This time, Motion can't escape its fate either. --- With such concentrated liquidity, there are only two possible outcomes later: either zero or rescue, no third way. --- Why do I feel this data is even more important than the token itself? Need to keep an eye on it. --- Early concentration is normal? Normal, you m... This is a landmine. --- Five wallets hold over forty percent of the chips, how much confidence does that give?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleShadow

· 01-20 03:00

Same old story... 14% of the 4-hour aging, the level of absurdity is off the charts --- VANISH wallet's move is quite tricky, but you can't hide the truth --- Feels like Motion is just a standard VC money-grabbing scheme, the holding data makes it obvious what's going on --- Are early projects all like this? Feels more concentrated than meme coins... --- That 5.6% in bubblemap is really shocking, liquidity is wasted --- This broken token distribution is even more uneven than my pocket money, betting on it will only lose --- Xander and the others are probably the whales, they already planned how to dump from the start --- Just wait and see the crash, few early projects are able to survive such absurdity --- With such a poor holding pattern, there are still people involved... Web3 really dares to play everything --- If it were me, I’d just pass, I don’t want to step on this kind of landmine

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-20 02:38

An 4-hour account age with a 14% return, this just doesn't seem right... Studies show that such highly concentrated early distribution is basically a sign of an impending collapse. --- VANISH wallet accounts total 10.8%, along with a few big holders... Overall, the Gini coefficient of the Motion token is estimated to be ridiculously high. --- From a technical perspective, this kind of holding structure is a liquidity trap. Imagine what would happen if these people all dumped their holdings at once. --- New projects are indeed common, but saying "worth monitoring" is just a polite way of saying "keep your reservations." I'll be straightforward—this thing carries significant risk. --- 5.6% concentrated in one cluster? It’s obvious on the bubble map once you look closely. No matter how carefully it’s packaged, it can’t hide the centralization. --- Instead of discussing future development, it’s better to ask when these accounts will move... That’s the real key to determining the fate of Motion.

View OriginalReply0