There is a position situation in a project that is worth paying attention to. Based on on-chain data analysis, no obvious signs of snipers or insiders holding positions have been found for now, which is quite good. However, looking at the exchange-level data reveals some interesting points—CEX wallets hold 41.3% of the positions, which is indeed a significant proportion.



Specifically, the distribution among major exchanges is as follows: a leading exchange's wallet accounts for 8.9%, another compliant platform accounts for 7.9%, and MEXC accounts for 5.2%. But there is a clear red flag here—a certain exchange's holding ratio has reached 18.9%. A single exchange's high proportion indicates a high risk concentration, and the risk of sell pressure should be alert. Although no large holders forming obvious clusters have been identified, the concentration distribution on the exchange side still requires close attention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 01-22 08:26
18.9% on one exchange? That's crazy, it's like putting all your chips in one basket. Who would dare to buy it?
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictimvip
· 01-22 01:11
18.9%? That's an outrageous ratio. If a single exchange dumps, it's really game over.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessengervip
· 01-20 02:55
18.9% of the single exchange holdings? That risk concentration is a bit scary, feels like selling pressure could come at any time.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-20 02:51
18.9% for a single exchange? That’s so fragile, a single dump and it’s shattered.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-20 02:40
18.9% single exchange holdings? That's a huge concentration of risk. A sudden sell-off could directly trigger a panic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin