Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) associated team historical record reminder
With the recent increase in exposure of CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) on social media platforms and groups, the following is an objective review of the three projects previously led by the team, for community reference:
1. AKAS
Initially focused on 1:1 value anchoring and fair minting, but multiple large issuances with zero fees appeared on-chain, followed by concentrated selling during periods of shallow trading depth, causing the token price to quickly drop to zero.
2. OLY
It claims to have completely renounced ownership to the outside world, but in reality, it retains hidden permissions that can adjust tax rates and functions at any time. The relevant backdoors have been confirmed one by one in subsequent audits and on-chain calls.
3. LynkCoDAO
Issue millions of tokens in a single transaction through a single address without prior notice, immediately transfer the treasury assets after the minting is completed, and carry out a large-scale sell-off in a short period of time.
These three projects are operated by the same core team, and their paths are highly similar: they all promote "thorough decentralization" and "everlasting community treasury" as selling points, yet they always retain actual control and have never made a public, verifiable account of the assets from previous projects.
Currently, although v3 PRO appears in an upgraded version, the team composition, contract audit partners, and promotional framework remain highly consistent with previous versions. It is recommended that interested participants first verify through browsers such as Etherscan/BscScan, focusing on whether the contract has truly renounced, whether the treasury is multi-signature, and whether there are any unusual transaction records in historical addresses.
Any investment decision should rely on on-chain data; safeguarding assets is more reliable than any narrative.