Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Brevis’s recent moves are really impressive—they’ve secured partnerships with both Polymarket and KaitoAI, two leading projects, planting their flag in both the prediction market and InfoFi sectors. If they keep up this momentum, things are going to get tough for the competition.
But there’s an interesting detail—Brevis claims to be the “first decentralized zero-knowledge proof generation marketplace,” but Boundless is also calling itself the “first” in this space. Is this a case of overlapping claims? Or do they define “first” on completely different terms? Any tech-savvy folks care to explain—between the two, which project is actually more cutting-edge?
Brevis really has strong capabilities in holding on to big players, but Boundless isn’t a pushover either. Let’s see who can truly deliver hard-core user data.
Both claim to be number one, it’s just a typical case of differing definitions of "my first"; it’s all marketing tricks.
Polymarket and KaitoAI are indeed impressive in execution, but can the ecosystem really operate smoothly? We’ll have to see their performance later.
To be honest, these "first" labels are becoming increasingly cheap; everyone wants to use this as a gimmick to raise funds.
Both Boundless and Brevis want to snatch the title of "first", which feels a bit awkward. To put it bluntly, it's still just the same marketing strategy.
Both claim to be pioneers, yet neither can prove who is more hardcore, which is quite funny.
Honestly, securing Polymarket does have some weight, but relying solely on endorsements from top projects doesn't explain much; the key is whether the ecosystem can truly take off.
Terms like "first" and "the first" are as common in the encryption circle as air; the real competitiveness lies in the product itself.
I haven't delved deeply into the solutions from Boundless, but from the perspective of financing and ecological layout, Brevis does seem to be making a strong move.
So this dispute over "first" is basically just each side talking; in the end, it's up to the market to determine the victor.
What’s the actual technical solution on Boundless’s side? I honestly can’t figure out what the real difference is.
Polymarket is picking up orders so fast, must be throwing a lot of ecosystem grants around.
Both claim to be pioneers, but it just feels like a mashup of improved solutions.
That’s just how this market works—whoever raises more money gets to be "number one," and tech ends up just being an added bonus.
Feels like the ZK space is a bit overhyped… the real user numbers aren’t that high.
That said, the Polymarket + KaitoAI combo actually seems interesting—there’s definitely potential with data + prediction.
"Hardcore" has been totally overused, whoever can launch earlier is the real winner.
Brevis moves quickly, but how far this fusion play can go still depends on the follow-up.
Who is more hardcore? It depends on the tech stack, not just the marketing approach.
Brevis is indeed impressive, but it's interesting that both claim to be the "first." I guess each has their own definition.
The hardcore aspect still depends on whose zk solution can really be used; just shouting slogans is useless.
Where are the hard-core arguments? I haven't seen any technical details, just listening to the bull isn't useful.
Polymarket's achievement is indeed impressive, but the term "first" should be used cautiously, as it can easily backfire.
Those who can truly survive are not the ones who rush to be first, but those who can actually get things done.
Let's wait and see how Boundless acts next, it's still too early to judge.
---
Polymarket and KaitoAI both jumping in at the same time—this is honestly a bit wild. Other projects must be getting nervous.
---
Honestly, it’s all just marketing hype. Anyone can slap the label “decentralized zero-knowledge” on themselves.
---
That’s just how the ZK track is right now—everyone claims they were the earliest and the strongest, but no one actually talks much about their technical specs.
---
Feels like Brevis is telling a good fundraising story this round. The technical details aren’t all that clear.
---
Wait, Boundless is also the first? So there are a lot of “firsts” in this track, huh?
---
Both of them claiming to be first just makes me laugh. It’s like a contest of “who ate the crab first.”
---
I’m curious whose zero-knowledge proof generation logic is more elegant. You should be able to tell from the papers alone.
---
Polymarket is moving fast, but calling it “the first” is questionable.