Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
Gate MCP
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Reflecting on the project journey over the years, I can't help but feel a mix of emotions. The news of Ether.fi DAO proposing to buy back ETHFI tokens reminded me of THORWallet's token support program back in the day. History always repeats itself in surprising ways.
Ether.fi plans to buy back $50 million worth of ETHFI, which is quite a substantial move. The buyback will commence when ETHFI's price drops below $3, employing a strategy that shows some sophistication. However, ETHFI has already fallen to $0.93, well below the planned buyback price, indicating that market confidence has indeed been shaken.
This buyback strategy is actually inspired by traditional finance practices. In the crypto world, many projects with solid revenue but weak secondary market demand have employed similar tactics. But Ether.fi directly tying the buyback to the token price is a rather innovative approach.
Looking back, when THORWallet launched its token support program, the market's reaction was mixed. Some saw it as a way to maintain token value, while others viewed it as a tacit admission of the project's lack of appeal. Now it seems that both THORWallet and Ether.fi are responding to market fluctuations in their own ways.
However, a sharp decline in token price often signals deeper underlying issues. Can buybacks alone truly solve the fundamental problems? Projects should perhaps focus more on enhancing product value and expanding their user base. After all, without genuine demand and practical use cases, any token will ultimately struggle to appreciate in value.
Over the years, I have witnessed many projects rise and fall. Some temporarily stabilized through buybacks, while others ultimately failed due to neglecting core issues. Whether Ether.fi's move can turn the tide remains to be seen, but it will certainly be a case worth watching in this cycle.