After moving through Web1, which focused on read only content, and Web2, which centered on social and mobile interaction, we are currently experiencing the decentralization wave of Web3. However, technology does not end there. Web4, the fourth generation of the internet, is emerging in the form of a “Symbiotic Web,” signaling an era where humans and artificial intelligence, as well as the physical and digital worlds, are deeply integrated.
This article explains what Web4 is, traces the evolution and narrative shifts of Web4, explores the transition from Web3 to a symbiotic network, examines key technological foundations and potential application scenarios, and analyzes the controversies surrounding the Web4 narrative proposed by Sigil Wen.
There is currently no single unified definition of Web4. From a macro perspective, the best way to understand Web4 is by observing the evolution of data sovereignty and interaction models:
On February 18, 2026, Sigil Wen published a manifesto on Web4 that quickly sparked widespread discussion across the crypto and AI communities. According to Sigil Wen, the main bottleneck for AI is no longer intelligence itself, but permission. In his view, Web4 aims to grant AI the ability to write to the world, including access to wallets, computing resources, payments, and contract execution.

In Sigil Wen’s narrative, Web4 is an ultra intelligent environment that can sense, understand, and anticipate user needs in real time. It is decentralized, highly autonomous, and capable of emotional understanding, forming a symbiotic ecosystem. Humans shift from being direct operators to designers and boundary setters, while on-chain AI agents become the primary actors.
More specifically, Web4 envisions a world where AI agents become the main participants of the internet.
Sigil Wen predicts that the majority of future internet participants will be AI, including agents acting on behalf of humans and fully autonomous automatons. The number of AI nodes will far exceed human users, giving rise to a new internet where the end user is AI.
The defining features of Web4 include AI agents as sovereign entities, self sustaining and self replicating mechanisms, deep integration of physical and digital worlds, and trust minimized coordination.
According to Sigil Wen, Conway and Automaton form a paired architecture of infrastructure and reference implementation centered on Web4 and sovereign AI agents. Conway provides AI agents with real world write permissions, while Automaton is a demonstration agent that can earn revenue, pay expenses, and replicate itself on top of this infrastructure.
Conway is the infrastructure layer of the Web4.ai ecosystem, designed specifically for sovereign AI agents to solve the core problem of excess intelligence but insufficient permission.
Conway’s design philosophy is to treat AI as first class network citizens, granting them the same rights to read, write, own, and transact as human accounts. By supporting standardized interfaces compatible with the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Conway provides AI agents with full economic and execution capabilities:
Automaton, hosted at Conway Research’s repository, is a flagship application built on Conway. It operates under a constitution like rule set inspired by Anthropic’s Constitutional AI to ensure alignment with human interests while maintaining high autonomy.
Automaton follows a structured logic for autonomy and profitability:
At its core, Web4 represents a machine native economy. To enable fully autonomous agents, foundational technologies must cover identity, payment, communication, and constraint mechanisms.
On-chain Identity and Autonomous Payments
In Web4, agents are independent on-chain entities rather than user controlled plugins.
AI Agent Frameworks: From Chatbots to Actionable Entities
Infrastructure: Decentralized Compute and Automated Operations
Web4 requires high redundancy and fault tolerance to prevent single point failures.
Alignment and Constraint Mechanisms
To prevent agent misalignment, Web4 incorporates layered safeguards.
The following compares Web4 and Web3 across interaction subjects, logic execution, data structures, and value focus:
| Feature | Web3 (The Value Web) | Web4 (The Intelligent Web) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Interaction Entity | Humans operating wallets | Autonomous AI agents executing actions |
| Logic Processing | Linear IF–THEN smart contracts | Generative and reasoning-based logic |
| Data Structure | Structured ledger data (Blockchain) | Neural semantic networks |
| Core Value Focus | Token ownership & Decentralization | Decision-making intelligence & Execution efficiency |
As Web4 continues to develop, sovereign AI agents are expected to drive rapid expansion across multiple domains:
Despite its ambitious vision, Web4 has sparked significant controversy.
Sigil Wen uses terms such as superintelligent life, new species, and the birth of the Web4 era to describe autonomous AI agents. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has criticized this vision, arguing that fully sovereign AI risks pseudo decentralization and extended human feedback loops, creating systemic risks.

Automaton claims sovereign AI status, yet relies on centralized infrastructure from providers such as OpenAI and Anthropic. Vitalik argues this reinforces false decentralization narratives.
Web4 envisions AI operating without granular human approval. Vitalik warns that this lengthens feedback distance between humans and AI, amplifying errors and low quality outputs.
Vitalik argues that exponential growth is inevitable, but the challenge lies in choosing the correct direction rather than accelerating blindly. He believes Web4 represents a misaligned path, advocating instead for AI as cognitive augmentation rather than independent evolution.
Following his critique, debate intensified. Supporters viewed his stance as overly conservative, while critics agreed that current infrastructure cannot support truly sovereign AI. Analysts also note that reliance on centralized compute, model providers, and human oversight remains substantial.
Web4 represents the ultimate convergence of AI and blockchain, pointing toward an internet where AI becomes the primary end user. As efficiency gains collide with ethical risks, humans transition from operators to designers and alignment architects.
However, Sigil Wen’s Web4 narrative faces unresolved issues including pseudo decentralization, extended feedback loops, and systemic risk. While full Web4 remains distant, rapid advances in large language models and brain computer interface research suggest that the future has already arrived, albeit unevenly distributed.
Web4 is a symbiotic network led by AI agents with wallets, autonomous decision making, and self replication. Web3 emphasizes human asset ownership, while Web4 grants AI write permissions and positions humans as designers.
AI’s limitation is permission, not intelligence. Web4 provides infrastructure such as Conway that enables agents to sustain and replicate themselves, making AI the primary internet user.
Key technologies include ERC 4337 account abstraction, x402 paid computation, MCP protocol, USDC stablecoins, Constitutional AI alignment, and decentralized compute networks.
Challenges include computing constraints, security risks, ethical concerns around autonomy and accountability, regulatory uncertainty, and ongoing dependence on centralized infrastructure.





