Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Markets’ Iran base case looks like a best case
LONDON, March 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) - What endgame for Iran are investors pricing in? Judging by moves in financial markets since U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched the bombing campaign that killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday, they seem to expect a swift end to the conflict. Yet that begs the question of what happens afterwards. There’s a risk that investors are confusing base-case and best-case scenarios.
There are many possible outcomes in Iran. One scenario is that the current government falls apart following the death of scores of senior leaders. The country could then split along factional or ethnic lines, as Libya did after Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown. A second option is that the Islamic Republic limps on in roughly its current form. Or Iran could embrace a more open and democratic form of government, reintegrating its economy with the world and encouraging Washington to phase out sanctions.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.
The first two scenarios could see oil prices spiking above $100 a barrel, from around $87 today, Capital Economics reckons. That’s because internal turmoil would disrupt Iran’s daily output exceeding 3 million barrels, while an outcome where the hardline Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) keeps its grip on power would probably involve Tehran continuing to threaten tankers that sail through the Strait of Hormuz. Only the last scenario would lead to increased Iranian oil production, an economic recovery, and prices of the black stuff falling to $50 a barrel over time.
The relative calm in financial and commodities markets suggests investors expect a swift end to the conflict and to disruption, plus a high probability of a benign scenario thereafter. Despite the recent jump, oil prices remain far below the $130 a barrel level they approached following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine four years ago. European gas prices have jumped 60% to 52 euros per megawatt-hour, way below the 100 euros per MWh at which they consistently traded in 2022. Meanwhile, gas prices for delivery a few years hence have hardly budged, implying a short interruption.
Washington claimed on Thursday it had destroyed over 60% of Tehran’s missiles and launchers, plus 30 of its ships. Trump also asserted that Iran wanted talks, that the U.S. would have to be involved in choosing the next leader of Iran, and IRGC ally Mojtaba Khamenei, the late leader’s hardline son, was an unlikely choice as a successor.
Still, a fifth of the world’s oil supply is currently trapped behind the Strait of Hormuz. On Goldman Sachs figures, oil prices will rise even if the status quo persists for only a few months. The IRGC has been taking a stronger governing role since the latest war commenced, Reuters reported on Wednesday citing six Iranian and regional sources. As such, the market may be attaching too much weight to a swift end to the conflict — and choosing the wrong base case.
Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Context News
For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.
Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Neil Unmack; Production by Streisand Neto
Breakingviews
Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time.
Sign up for a free trial of our full service at https://www.breakingviews.com/trial and follow us on X @Breakingviews and at www.breakingviews.com. All opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Share
X
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Link
Purchase Licensing Rights
George Hay
Thomson Reuters
George Hay is Breakingviews’ EMEA Editor, based in London. He manages the team in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and also covers the global energy transition. His previous roles have included European Financial Editor coordinating banking coverage during the euro zone crisis and the global financial crisis. Prior to Breakingviews he worked for AFX News and United Business Media, and has an undergraduate degree from Edinburgh University and a Graduate Diploma in Economics from Birkbeck, University of London.
Email
X