#稳定币监管与发展 Korea's recent moves are quite interesting — they directly cut off the space for risk asset transfers at the account level. In simple terms, it's similar to the approach in the stock market, where suspicious accounts are frozen during the investigation phase to prevent illegal proceeds from being transferred out via withdrawals.

I think the impact on the trading ecosystem is worth paying attention to: on one hand, tighter regulation will indeed crack down on traders who profit from price manipulation and arbitrage, which is a good long-term filter for the market. But on the other hand, this also means that the depth of regulatory intervention is increasing — expanding from trading behavior itself to controlling capital flows, making the financial attributes of virtual assets more clearly defined.

For us copy traders, the key is to improve our ability to identify traders' risk control capabilities. Not all high returns are worth copying, especially those that rely on extreme volatility or fuzzy strategies to accumulate profits. Under the tightening regulatory environment, risks are actually amplified. I now pay more attention to traders with transparent strategies, strict stop-loss measures, and steady returns — no matter how much regulation tightens, this kind of trading logic can stand the test.

Practice truly verifies everything; as the regulatory environment changes, our copy strategies must also adapt.