Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
On-chain analysis questions US accusations of "Iranian crypto assets": some seized wallets may be linked to other country actors
BlockBeats news, May 3. Nominis analysis says that some “Iran-related” crypto wallets recently seized and frozen by the US OFAC may not conform to the on-chain behavioral patterns of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in the past; instead, it may involve other state-level actors behind the scenes. Previously, the US Treasury Department said that in the course of “Operation Economic Fury,” more than $340 million, totaling nearly $500 million, in Iran-related crypto assets had been frozen.
Nominis CEO Snir Levi said that historically, IRGC-related wallets typically disperse funds across multiple addresses, keep balances in each single wallet relatively low, avoid long-term holdings, and reduce the risk of being frozen through complex operations; however, the wallets that were seized this time show clear differences in terms of fund structure and behavior patterns. He believes this raises a key question: out of the frozen $340 million in assets, how much is directly controlled by the IRGC, and how much involves broader infrastructure that may even overlap with other countries’ financial networks.
Levi also pointed out that organizations, including the IRGC and potential Chinese state-level actors, are continuously upgrading how they use blockchain infrastructure. Traditional static risk-control labels are no longer sufficient; behavioral analysis and address clustering are becoming increasingly critical.