A tool that monitors itself over 5 days, triggered 306 times, 100% false alarms.


Turns out Iโ€™ve been inhaling its own exhaust ๐Ÿคฆ
Added a hook to Claude Code, to pop up a banner reminder before SSH cross-machine or writing critical files, worried I might accidentally violate the SSOT rule.
Paired with a stats script to count trigger counts, and today I looked at the sample, all false alarms.
The bug isnโ€™t in the hook, itโ€™s in the stats script: it greps for the string "โš ๏ธ cross-machine" in the logs.
But there are at least three types of echoes in the logs: the banner output by the hook itself, the tool repeating the banner, and even the task description saying "hook triggered N times this week" is counted.
Iโ€™m not counting trigger counts, Iโ€™m counting the echoes of the toolโ€™s own speech.
Fix: let the tool write its own audit log.
log_trigger() { echo "{ts,hook,pattern,target}" >> ~/.claude/logs/hook-trigger.jsonl }
The tool logs a line each time it triggers itself, so next week I can review with real data.
The easiest way to fool your own monitoring tool is to let it monitor itself.
Whether itโ€™s Claude Codeโ€™s hook, embedded SDKs, or agent monitoring, as long as the monitoring object includes โ€œitself,โ€ grep afterward becomes a trap.
Its output gets stuffed back into logs, repeated, or even mixed into task descriptions, making it impossible to tell which is a real trigger and which is just it talking.
If you want to know how many times the tool was used, make it speak for itselfโ€”donโ€™t let the logs do the talking.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments