Recently, some people have been comparing on-chain yield products to U.S. Treasury yields, which sounds quite reasonable, but I personally care more about "who sets the rules" when it comes to interactions. Airdrops, to put it simply, are a game of strategy; the more you act like a sheep, the easier it is to be front-run: using a full set of one-click scripts, running ten accounts with the same path, constantly chasing the hottest pools... basically signaling "come and snatch me."

My approach is more conservative: I only interact with stablecoin pools and mechanisms I understand, I don't aim for high interaction frequency, and I avoid overly templated actions; I first calculate the transaction fees and time costs clearly, and if I see the project clearly inflating interaction data, I stop. I’d rather miss out than chase aggressively. When FOMO hits, I remind myself: those who can truly afford to distribute airdrops are not missing my "filler liquidity." We’ll talk more next time.